Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Magazine Subscription
HR Made Simple   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (3)


Heartbreak Leave: A New Kind of Employee Perk
October 5, 2008

I was surprised when I heard someone scoff at the idea of providing employees with “heartbreak leave,” which is a concept being introduced by a Japanese company called Hime & Co.   Its founder, Miki Hiradate, decided to give employees paid time off to mourn and/or heal from a break up.  As far as I’m concerned it’s a no-brainer.  First of all, break ups make people sick anyway.  So let’s start there.  Over the years, I have had countless employees “call out” to deal with the emotion, tears, upset and depression resulting from the loss of a relationship.  It makes perfect sense to give people a little space to recover and bounce back from a broken heart, because in the end, they are going to take it anyway.

Meanwhile, why not take advantage of an opportunity to work with employees rather than against them and create a better employer/employee relationship by extending this kind of compassion and support?  It certainly is humane and I would say bound to generate a healthier, more productive and committed workforce.  Frankly, I don’t think that it’s any different from bereavement leave on one end of the time-off philosophy scale and honeymoon leave on the other.

What I don’t get is how Hiradate came up with the allocation of time by age.   A young woman in her early 20’s can take one day, in her late 20’s she gets two days and a thirty-something is entitled to three days.  Now, what the policy doesn’t seem to cover is what happens after 40.  But even so, like many other things, the devil is in the details and I’m afraid that this is where it all falls apart.

Imposing the degree to which a human being suffers by age, is ludicrous.  It’s no one’s call to decide that a younger person’s pain requires less than an older person's (and we’re only talking about a few years difference here).  It totally  depends on the person and the relationship.  Divorce, puppy love, first love or the love of a lifetime – loss is loss and it hurts like hell no matter what.  Ms. Hiradate would be better off giving everyone two days, lower the risk of being misunderstood, bias and/or out of touch and maximize the psychological benefits of the perk.  

My other concern is the uniquely feminine nature of “shitsuren kyuka,” otherwise known as time off to fix a broken heart.  Granted, Hime & Co. is exclusively made up of women, but I’d hate to see this catch on as a “girl thing.”  Guys deserve to lick their wounds too.  I guess I needn’t worry too much should it makes it’s way to the United States because before we’d even have the chance to shed a tear, we’d be in the courts fighting both age and gender discrimination suits. 

Posted by Donna Flagg on October 5, 2008 | Comments (3)


Industries: Human Resources
October 6, 2008
In response to: Heartbreak Leave: A New Kind of Employee Perk
terry commented:

You've got to be kidding! Doesn't "put on your big girl pants and get over it" fit in this case? Or take a vacation day. It's no wonder we're in trouble if every little thing has to be rewarded with time off. Grow up! Work is the best thing to do when you need a distraction. It gives a much better perspective than wallowing in self pity.




October 6, 2008
In response to: Heartbreak Leave: A New Kind of Employee Perk
karen commented:

that's assuming that you're home pitying yourself. it's like saying if someone dies, suck it up, no reason to feel anything, it's time to be an adult... that is absurd, unless you're a robot. if this is any indication of how people really think, no wonder our workplace is such a cold and greedy mess these days. not to mention the fact that we are talking days here, no more than three, not a six month leave! jeez...




October 7, 2008
In response to: Heartbreak Leave: A New Kind of Employee Perk
Donna commented:

Well I am a big believer that people need opportunities to do whatever they need to do to work things out for themselves. If they don't need that time alone, or with a friend or at the movies or shopping and would prefer the distraction of work, that's fine too. I think it's dangerous to assume that all people think the same way and bring the same needs to work or anything else.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements



SPONSORED LINKS


About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Free Subscriptions   |   Affiliate Links
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.