Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Magazine Subscription
HR Made Simple   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (7)


Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
June 19, 2008

Boy, talk about the pendulum swinging one way and then back again. We started out in the “PC” revolution where it seemed that every descriptive label used in our language was being called into question. Today, particularly in the workplace, that same political correctness has evolved and embedded itself into our corporate lexicon to the point that we don’t even know it’s there anymore.

But yesterday one of my business partners reminded me of just how crazy it was back when the whole “PC” movement began. We’d been talking about our days together at CHANEL when she recalled an exchange that took place during a big meeting with a big account.

Apparently, someone had asked her to describe someone else who had worked in one of the stores. So she (my partner) went on to say that this person was, “short, brunette, with a bob and glasses.” Well wouldn’t you know, someone was offended? So much so that she requested that my partner please refer to short people as “vertically challenged individuals.” In the meeting (as if there weren’t probably more important things on the agenda) she expressed her discomfort and dissatisfaction with the reference to calling a short person….well, short.  

But it makes you wonder.  What was so wrong with the word “short” or being short? I found her desire to rename it more offensive than anything. Short is short. And certainly, it’s not bad. “Challenged” makes it sound as though you can’t do something - like grow more - which you can’t.  So, which is worse? 

At least nowadays, people can be a lot of things without other people feeling a compulsion to call them something else.


Posted by Donna Flagg on June 19, 2008 | Comments (7)


Industries: Human Resources
June 23, 2008
In response to: Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
roger commented:

"Short, brunette, with a bob and glasses..." Is her best friend Peppermint Patty? Not Chanel material. Perhaps the Daisy Hill mushroom farm is hiring.




June 24, 2008
In response to: Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
Donna commented:

Oh, on the contrary...bobs were very CHANEL. Plus, Coco was about beauty at any size. The woman in question was stunning!




June 24, 2008
In response to: Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
roger commented:

Apologies to the bobbed. However to this beholder, short can be cute, pretty, perhaps beautiful. But stunning? That requires presence, elevation. Like a flower to the sun, the eye prefers to star gaze.




June 24, 2008
In response to: Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
Donna commented:

Yes, stunning! Time to abandon the stereotypes. Lovely poeticism though. Thank you!




June 27, 2008
In response to: Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
Brian commented:

I love short chicks.




June 27, 2008
In response to: Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
Derek commented:

Me too.




June 30, 2008
In response to: Political Correctness: My, how far we’ve come
tim commented:

This could turn into a short chicks dating site. On Thursday's membership is half off.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements



SPONSORED LINKS


About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Free Subscriptions   |   Affiliate Links
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites